Celebrating excellent research and practice in Learning Technology
Information about this year's awards will be published here shortly.
The ALT Learning Technologist of the Year Awards celebrate and reward excellent research and practice and outstanding achievement in Learning Technology. Established in 2007, the Awards have established a benchmark for outstanding achievement in Learning Technology on a national scale and attract competitive entries from the UK and internationally. All entries are reviewed by an independent judging panel chaired by the President of ALT. This year, the awards were proudly sponsored by Edina. Voting closed for the Community Choice Awards, on Wednesday 4 September 2019, at midday. For full information on all the entries and winners, see our voting page.
About the Awards
Award categories
The following award categories were awarded:
- Learning Technologist of the Year (individual)
- Learning Technologist of the Year (team)
- Learning Technology Research Project of the Year
Judging panel
The expert panel of judges was chaired by Martin Weller, President of ALT. The panel represented expertise from different sectors and countries, bringing together a wealth of experience in Learning Technology. The 2019 judging panel included:
Learning Technologist of the Year (Team & individual)
- Dr Peter Bryant - Associate Dean (Education) and Associate Professor of Business at the University of Sydney Business School (Australia)
- Elizabeth Charles - Assistant Director of Library Services at Birkbeck, University of London
- Paul Driver - Senior Learning Technologist - Anglia Ruskin University
- Dr Mark Glynn - Head of the Teaching Enhancement Unit - Dublin City University
- Dr Peter Shukie, Academic Lead in Digital Innovation in Teaching and Learning, University Centre Blackburn College
- Ros Walker, Learning Technologist, University of Stirling
Learning Technology Research Project of the Year
- Dr Matthew Barr - Lecturer (Computer Science), University of Glasgow
- Dr Liz Bennett - University Teach Fellow, University of Huddersfield
- Dr Jill Buban - Chief Academic Officer at Unizin
- Dr Michael Flavin - Head of Curriculum Innovation at King's College London
Community Choice Award
All short-listed entries were asked to supply a short video (with subtitles, no longer than 3 minutes) and supporting information for the public vote deciding the Community Choice Award. Voting is now closed, but you can view the entries here. If you are looking for inspiration, have a look at the entries from last year's finalists and the recordings from last years webinar series.
Award Ceremony
The Awards was presented at the Gala Dinner of the ALT Annual Conference on Wednesday 4 September 2019 in the McEwan Hall at the University of Edinburgh, UK. The judging panel made the following awards: First, second and third prize as follows: 1st prize £1000; 2nd prize £500; 3rd prize £250. The Community Choice, voted for openly, was also awarded at the Gala Dinner. Finalists (up to two for teams) were invited to attend the ALT Conference Gala Dinner to receive their Awards.
Winners of the Awards
You can find out more about the winners of the Awards from previous years here.
How to enter (now closed)
The awards are free to enter and are open to individuals and teams based anywhere in the world. If you'd like to see what it takes to win, have a look at the entries from last year's finalists and the recordings from last years webinar series.
Entry form
You need to complete all sections of the appropriate online entry form. Entries will be judged on the basis of the information you provide and the evidence you refer to. We acknowledge all entries via email. The closing date for entries is Monday, 25 March 2019 for all categories.
- Entry Form A: Learning Technologist of the Year (individual or teams)
- Entry Form B: Learning Technology Research Project of the Year
Short-list
The judging panel reviews all entries and the highest scoring entries in each category are short-listed. All entries will be notified whether they have been short-listed or not by Thursday 18 April 19.
Interviews for short-listed entries
All short-listed entries will be invited for an interview, either in person or online. Interview dates are provisionally 1/2 May 19 in Milton Keynes. Interviews will be 25 min long, and you will be asked to give a 10 min presentation followed by questions from the judging panel.
Finalists
Following the interviews all short-listed entries will be notified and Finalists invited to the Award Ceremony. Finalists will be asked to supply a short video (under 3 minutes with subtitles) and supporting information for the public vote deciding the Community Choice Award. The public vote takes place in August.
Judging criteria
Entries are judged (from the completed entry form, and, if short-listed, at interview) in answer to the following criteria and questions:
| Learning Technologist of the Year |
Learning Technology Research Project of the Year |
The judging criteria are informed by the CMALT principles. We include these here for information: |
|---|---|---|
|
What makes your work THIS YEAR an outstanding achievement in Learning Technology? ('this year' refers to the 12 months prior to submitting your entry) |
What makes this research project THIS YEAR an outstanding achievement in Learning Technology? ('this year' refers to the 12 months prior to submitting your entry) |
|
| What makes your/your team's work excellent? | What makes this research project excellent? | A commitment to exploring and understanding the interplay between technology and learning |
| How did you develop and support this achievement? | A clear, credible statement of what methodological approach was taken and which, if any, ethical implications were considered | A commitment to keep up to date with new technologies |
| Strong evidence that your work has made a significant impact on practices within the your or your team's organisation, community, or sphere of influence | Strong evidence that the project made a significant contribution to Learning Technology, including evidence of its impact | A commitment to communicate and disseminate effective practice |
| Clear explanation of how others may learn from your work and what have you done to enable others to do so |
Clear explanation of how others may learn from this research project and what have you done to enable others to do so |
An empathy with and willingness to learn from colleagues from different backgrounds and specialism |